Pain Management: Step-by-Step Guide on How to Write SOAP Notes

Updated January 2026

Pain management documentation is among the most scrutinized in healthcare, requiring meticulous attention to regulatory compliance, risk assessment, and treatment justification. With evolving opioid prescribing guidelines, PDMP requirements, and DEA regulations, pain management SOAP notes must demonstrate clinical reasoning, document informed consent, and support the appropriateness of treatment decisions. This guide provides comprehensive instructions for documenting pain management encounters in compliance with federal and state regulations.

Create Your Pain Management SOAP Note in 2 Minutes

Start with 20 free SOAP notes. No credit card required.

Unique Aspects of Pain Management Documentation

Pain management documentation differs from other specialties due to heightened regulatory scrutiny and the complexity of chronic pain care:

  1. Regulatory Compliance: Must align with DEA requirements, state PDMP laws, and CDC opioid prescribing guidelines
  2. Risk Stratification: Mandatory documentation of opioid risk assessment tools (ORT, SOAPP-R, DIRE)
  3. PDMP Review: Required documentation of prescription drug monitoring program checks
  4. Opioid Agreements: Treatment contracts and informed consent for controlled substances
  5. Urine Drug Testing: Documentation of monitoring protocols and results interpretation
  6. Multimodal Treatment: Evidence that non-opioid and non-pharmacologic treatments are utilized
  7. Functional Assessment: Tracking functional improvement, not just pain scores
  8. Medical Necessity: Clear justification for continued opioid therapy

2026 Regulatory Framework

CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids (2022, Updated)

Per the CDC Opioid Prescribing Guideline:

  1. Nonpharmacologic and nonopioid therapy are preferred for chronic pain
  2. Establish treatment goals before starting opioid therapy
  3. Start low, go slow: Use lowest effective dose
  4. Evaluate benefits and harms within 1-4 weeks of starting opioids
  5. Assess risk using validated tools before and during therapy
  6. Check PDMP before prescribing and periodically during treatment
  7. Use urine drug testing before starting and at least annually
  8. Avoid concurrent benzodiazepine prescribing when possible
  9. Offer naloxone when prescribing opioids to high-risk patients

DEA Controlled Substance Requirements

Per 21 CFR Part 1306 - DEA Prescribing Rules:

  • Schedule II prescriptions require written prescription (electronic prescribing for controlled substances - EPCS - is permitted)
  • No refills allowed for Schedule II medications
  • Legitimate medical purpose and course of professional practice must be documented
  • Prescriber must have valid DEA registration
  • Patient relationship must be established

CMS 2026 Opioid-Related Requirements

Per CMS 2026 Physician Fee Schedule:

  • Pain management services documentation must support medical necessity
  • Prior authorization requirements for certain opioid prescriptions
  • Opioid treatment program (OTP) documentation requirements

Subjective Section (S)

The Subjective section in pain management requires comprehensive pain characterization, functional impact assessment, and risk factor documentation.

Subjective Section (S) Components

  1. Chief Complaint:

    • Primary pain complaint with duration
    • Treatment context (initial evaluation vs. follow-up)
    • Example: "Follow-up for chronic low back pain management, 15 years duration"
  2. Comprehensive Pain Assessment (PQRST):

    • P - Provocative/Palliative: What makes pain worse or better
    • Q - Quality: Character of pain (burning, aching, sharp, stabbing, throbbing)
    • R - Region/Radiation: Location and radiation pattern
    • S - Severity: Current, best, worst, average pain scores (0-10)
    • T - Timing: Onset, duration, frequency, constant vs. intermittent
    • Example: "Constant aching low back pain, 6/10 currently (worst 9/10, best 4/10), radiating to left posterior thigh, worse with prolonged standing, improved with rest and medication"
  3. Functional Impact Assessment:

    • Activities of daily living (ADLs)
    • Instrumental ADLs (work, driving, housework)
    • Sleep quality
    • Mood and relationships
    • Work/disability status
    • Example: "Pain limits standing to 15 minutes, unable to work as electrician, sleeping 4-5 hours/night with frequent awakenings"
  4. Current Pain Treatment Regimen:

    • All pain medications (opioids, non-opioids, adjuvants)
    • Dosages, frequency, adherence
    • Effectiveness and side effects
    • Example: "Oxycodone 10mg q6h PRN (taking 3-4 tablets daily), gabapentin 300mg TID. Reports 50% pain relief. Mild constipation managed with docusate."
  5. Treatment History:

    • Prior medications tried and outcomes
    • Interventional procedures performed
    • Physical therapy and other non-pharmacologic treatments
    • Surgical history related to pain condition
    • Example: "Failed trials of NSAIDs (GI upset), tramadol (inadequate relief). Completed 12 weeks PT with minimal improvement. L4-L5 laminectomy 2018 with temporary improvement."
  6. PDMP Review Discussion:

    • Acknowledgment that PDMP was reviewed
    • Discussion of any concerns identified
    • Per state PDMP requirements
    • Example: "PDMP reviewed on [date]. Patient receiving controlled substances only from this practice. No concerning patterns identified."
  7. Risk Assessment Tools:

    • Opioid Risk Tool (ORT) score
    • Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain (SOAPP-R)
    • DIRE Score (if applicable)
    • Example: "ORT Score: 7 (moderate risk). SOAPP-R: 12 (low risk)."
  8. Substance Use History:

    • Current and past alcohol use (quantity, frequency)
    • Tobacco use
    • Illicit drug use history
    • Personal and family history of substance use disorders
    • Example: "Denies current illicit drug use. History of alcohol use disorder, in recovery x 8 years. Family history of opioid use disorder (brother)."
  9. Mental Health Screening:

    • Depression screening (PHQ-2/PHQ-9)
    • Anxiety screening (GAD-2/GAD-7)
    • History of psychiatric conditions
    • Example: "PHQ-9: 8 (mild depression). Reports chronic pain has negatively impacted mood. Seeing therapist monthly."
  10. Safety Assessment:

    • Suicidal ideation screening
    • Access to firearms
    • Safe medication storage
    • Example: "Denies SI/HI. Medications stored in locked cabinet away from grandchildren."
  11. Medication Agreement Compliance:

    • Adherence to opioid treatment agreement
    • Early refill requests
    • Lost/stolen medication reports
    • Example: "Compliant with opioid agreement. No early refill requests. Brings pill count to each visit."

Example Subjective Section for Pain Management

Subjective (Pain Management)
 
 
CHIEF COMPLAINT: Follow-up for chronic low back pain with radiculopathy, on opioid therapy
 
HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS:
58-year-old male with 15-year history of chronic low back pain following work-related injury (L4-L5 disc herniation) presents for routine pain management follow-up. Patient is currently on stable opioid regimen.
 
PAIN ASSESSMENT (PQRST):
- Location: Low back with radiation to left posterior thigh to knee
- Quality: Constant deep aching with intermittent sharp shooting pain down left leg
- Severity: Current 5/10; Average 6/10; Best (AM) 4/10; Worst (evening) 8/10
- Timing: Constant baseline with intermittent flares, worse end of day
- Aggravating factors: Prolonged standing (>15 min), sitting (>30 min), bending, lifting
- Relieving factors: Lying flat, ice, medication, stretching
- Associated symptoms: Left leg numbness/tingling, muscle spasms
 
FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT:
- ADLs: Independent with modification, uses long-handled reacher, sits to dress
- Sleep: 5-6 hours/night (improved from 3-4 hours prior to treatment), 2 awakenings
- Work: On long-term disability since 2019, was electrician
- Activity: Able to walk 1 block (improved from 1/2 block), can do light housework
- Mood: Reports improved outlook with better pain control
- Relationships: Able to attend grandchildren's activities occasionally
 
CURRENT MEDICATIONS:
- Oxycodone 10mg q6h PRN (averaging 3 tablets/day, down from 4)
- Gabapentin 600mg TID
- Meloxicam 15mg daily
- Tizanidine 4mg TID PRN
- Docusate 100mg BID for opioid-induced constipation
Patient reports approximately 50-60% pain relief with current regimen.
Side effects: Mild constipation (controlled), occasional drowsiness with tizanidine
 
TREATMENT HISTORY:
- Failed medications: Tramadol (inadequate), hydrocodone (inadequate), NSAIDs alone (GI upset, inadequate)
- Physical therapy: Completed 12 weeks in 2020 with minimal improvement
- Interventional: L4-L5 ESI x 3 (2021) - 4 weeks relief each; SI joint injection - no relief
- Surgery: L4-L5 microdiscectomy (2018) - 6 months improvement then recurrence
- Other: Uses TENS unit, ice/heat, stretching program
 
PDMP REVIEW:
- Reviewed [state] PDMP on [today's date]
- Findings: Patient receiving oxycodone and gabapentin from this practice only
- Last fill: Oxycodone 10mg #90, 28 days ago
- No other controlled substance prescribers identified
- No concerning patterns noted
 
RISK STRATIFICATION:
- Opioid Risk Tool (ORT): 7 (Moderate Risk)
- Family history of substance abuse (+1)
- Personal history of substance abuse (+3)
- Age 45-64 (+1)
- Psychological disease (+1)
- No preadolescent sexual abuse
- SOAPP-R: 14 (Low Risk)
- Current risk category: MODERATE - warrants enhanced monitoring
 
SUBSTANCE USE HISTORY:
- Alcohol: History of AUD, sober 8 years, attends AA weekly
- Tobacco: Former smoker, quit 2015 (20 pack-year history)
- Illicit drugs: Marijuana use in 20s, none since 1995. Denies other drug use.
- Family history: Brother with opioid use disorder (in treatment)
 
MENTAL HEALTH:
- PHQ-9 today: 6 (mild depression, stable)
- GAD-7 today: 4 (minimal anxiety)
- Currently seeing therapist monthly for chronic pain coping
- Denies SI/HI, no access issues to firearms
- Medications stored in locked safe
 
OPIOID AGREEMENT COMPLIANCE:
- Signed opioid treatment agreement: Yes (renewed 6 months ago)
- Compliance: Excellent - attends all appointments, no early refill requests
- Last UDS: [date] - consistent with prescribed medications, no illicit substances
- Pill count today: 24 tablets remaining (consistent with prescribed use)
- Naloxone: Has naloxone at home, trained on use
 
PATIENT GOALS:
- Maintain current function
- Continue working on physical conditioning
- Explore spinal cord stimulator evaluation
 

Objective Section (O)

The pain management Objective section documents physical examination findings, vital signs, urine drug testing results, and observational assessments for signs of medication misuse.

Objective Section (O) Components

  1. Vital Signs:

    • Blood pressure (important for pain assessment and medication effects)
    • Heart rate
    • Weight (for medication dosing and monitoring)
    • Pain score (per facility protocol)
    • Example: "BP 132/78, HR 72, Weight 195 lbs (stable), Pain 5/10"
  2. General Appearance and Behavior:

    • Level of distress
    • Affect and demeanor
    • Signs of sedation or intoxication
    • Gait observation
    • Example: "Alert, well-groomed, no acute distress. Normal affect. Ambulates with antalgic gait favoring left. No signs of sedation."
  3. Pain-Focused Physical Examination:

    • Inspection (posture, guarding, swelling)
    • Palpation (tenderness, muscle spasm)
    • Range of motion (with pain behavior notation)
    • Neurological examination (strength, sensation, reflexes)
    • Special tests relevant to condition
    • Example: "Lumbar spine exam: Tenderness L4-L5 paraspinals bilaterally, left > right. Positive straight leg raise left at 45 degrees. L5 dermatomal hypesthesia left."
  4. Functional Assessment:

    • Observed functional capacity
    • Gait analysis
    • Ability to rise from chair, get on exam table
    • Example: "Able to walk to exam room without assistance. Uses arms to rise from chair. Can heel-walk and toe-walk with mild difficulty."
  5. Signs of Misuse Evaluation:

    • Behavioral observations (appropriate vs. concerning)
    • Physical signs (pupil size, track marks, coordination)
    • Consistency between reported pain and observed behavior
    • Document using objective, non-judgmental language
  6. Urine Drug Testing Results:

    • Specimen validity testing
    • Expected medications present
    • Unexpected substances (positive or negative)
    • Interpretation and action taken
    • Example: "UDT (immunoassay): Positive for oxycodone (expected), negative for benzodiazepines, THC, cocaine, amphetamines, opiates. Consistent with prescribed regimen."
  7. Pill Count (if performed):

    • Number of pills remaining
    • Calculation of expected vs. actual
    • Example: "Pill count: 24 oxycodone tablets remaining. Prescribed 90 tablets on [date], 28 days ago. Expected remaining: 22-26. CONSISTENT."
  8. Review of Imaging/Diagnostics:

    • Relevant imaging findings
    • EMG/nerve conduction studies
    • Laboratory results

Example Objective Section for Pain Management

Objective (Pain Management)
 
 
VITAL SIGNS:
- Blood Pressure: 134/82 mmHg (at goal)
- Heart Rate: 74 bpm, regular
- Weight: 195 lbs (stable, previously 196 lbs)
- Pain Score: 5/10 (current)
- Respiratory Rate: 14 breaths/min
 
GENERAL APPEARANCE:
Alert, well-groomed male appearing stated age. Affect appropriate, engaged in conversation. No signs of sedation, intoxication, or withdrawal. No psychomotor agitation. Ambulates with mild antalgic gait favoring left lower extremity. Able to sit comfortably for interview with occasional position changes.
 
PAIN-FOCUSED EXAMINATION:
 
Lumbar Spine:
- Inspection: Mild flattening of lumbar lordosis. Surgical scar L4-L5 midline, well-healed. No swelling or erythema.
- Palpation: Moderate tenderness L4-L5 paraspinal muscles bilaterally, left > right. Trigger point left piriformis. No step-off. SI joints non-tender.
- Range of Motion: Flexion 50% (pain-limited), Extension 30% (pain-limited), Lateral bending reduced bilaterally
- Muscle spasm: Mild left paraspinal muscle spasm palpated
 
Neurological Examination:
- Motor: Left hip flexion 4/5, left knee extension 4+/5, left ankle dorsiflexion 4/5 (L4-L5 weakness), all other 5/5
- Sensory: Decreased light touch and pinprick L5 dermatome left lower extremity (lateral leg, dorsum of foot)
- Deep Tendon Reflexes: Patellar 2+ bilaterally, Achilles 1+ left, 2+ right
- Straight Leg Raise: Positive left at 45 degrees with reproduction of radicular symptoms, negative right
- Femoral stretch: Negative bilaterally
- Babinski: Downgoing bilaterally
 
Gait Assessment:
- Antalgic gait with shortened stance phase on left
- Able to tandem walk with mild difficulty
- Heel walk: Mild weakness left (L4-L5)
- Toe walk: Normal
 
FUNCTIONAL OBSERVATIONS:
- Rose from chair using armrests for assistance
- Able to get on/off exam table independently
- Removed shoes independently while seated
- Demonstrated reaching to floor with knees bent
 
SIGNS OF MISUSE EVALUATION:
- Pupils: 4mm, equal, reactive (normal)
- Coordination: Normal finger-to-nose, no tremor
- Speech: Normal rate, rhythm, clarity
- Behavior: Cooperative, makes appropriate eye contact, no drug-seeking behavior observed
- Affect/pain behavior: Consistent with reported pain level
- No track marks or skin lesions noted
- No concerning behaviors during visit
 
URINE DRUG TESTING (immunoassay, collected today):
- Specimen validity: Valid (temperature 96.4F, creatinine 85 mg/dL, pH 6.2)
- Oxycodone: POSITIVE (expected - prescribed)
- Opiates (morphine/codeine): Negative
- Benzodiazepines: Negative
- THC: Negative
- Cocaine: Negative
- Amphetamines: Negative
- Fentanyl: Negative
- Buprenorphine: Negative
INTERPRETATION: UDT consistent with prescribed regimen. No unexpected substances detected.
 
PILL COUNT:
- Oxycodone 10mg tablets remaining: 24
- Date prescribed: [28 days ago]
- Quantity prescribed: 90 tablets (30-day supply, 3 per day)
- Days since fill: 28
- Expected remaining: 22-26 tablets (based on 3 tablets/day average)
- ASSESSMENT: Pill count CONSISTENT with reported use
 
PDMP DATA (reviewed today):
- Last oxycodone fill: [28 days ago], this practice
- No other controlled substance prescriptions in past 12 months
- Pattern: Consistent monthly fills, no early refills
 
IMAGING REVIEW:
MRI Lumbar Spine ([date], 8 months ago):
- L4-L5: Post-surgical changes. Recurrent/residual disc protrusion left paracentral with moderate left L5 nerve root compression
- L3-L4: Mild disc bulge, no significant stenosis
- L5-S1: Mild degenerative changes, no significant nerve compression
 

Assessment Section (A)

The pain management Assessment synthesizes clinical findings, documents risk stratification, evaluates treatment response, and justifies continued therapy.

Assessment Section (A) Components

  1. Pain Diagnosis:

    • Primary pain diagnosis with ICD-10 code
    • Underlying pathology
    • Chronicity (acute, subacute, chronic)
  2. Opioid Therapy Assessment:

    • Indication for opioid therapy
    • Treatment response (function, pain, quality of life)
    • Tolerance assessment
    • Dependence vs. addiction assessment
  3. Risk Stratification:

    • Current risk level (low, moderate, high)
    • Basis for risk assessment
    • Changes from prior assessment
  4. Treatment Response Evaluation (4 A's):

    • Analgesia: Degree of pain relief
    • Activity: Functional improvement
    • Adverse effects: Side effects and management
    • Aberrant behaviors: Any concerning behaviors
  5. Benefits vs. Risks Analysis:

    • Document ongoing benefit
    • Weigh against risks
    • Support for continued treatment

Example Assessment Section for Pain Management

Assessment (Pain Management)
 
 
ASSESSMENT:
 
1. CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN WITH LEFT LUMBAR RADICULOPATHY (M54.42)
- Etiology: Post-laminectomy syndrome with recurrent L4-L5 disc protrusion and L5 nerve root compression
- Duration: 15 years, post-surgical
- Status: CHRONIC, STABLE on current regimen
- Objective findings correlate with reported symptoms (imaging, neurological exam)
 
2. CHRONIC OPIOID THERAPY FOR PAIN MANAGEMENT
- Current regimen: Oxycodone 10mg q6h PRN (stable x 18 months)
- Morphine Equivalent Daily Dose (MEDD): 45 MME/day (averaging 30 mg oxycodone/day)
- MME assessment: Below 50 MME/day threshold; appropriate for moderate-severe chronic pain
 
3. OPIOID RISK STRATIFICATION: MODERATE RISK
- ORT Score: 7 (moderate risk category)
- Risk factors present:
- History of alcohol use disorder (in stable recovery 8 years)
- Family history of substance use disorder
- Comorbid depression (mild, treated)
- Mitigating factors:
- Stable recovery, active AA participation
- Excellent treatment compliance
- Strong support system
- No aberrant behaviors in 18 months of treatment
- Risk assessment: Stable, no change from prior visit
 
4. TREATMENT RESPONSE EVALUATION (4 A's):
 
ANALGESIA:
- Current pain: 5-6/10 average (baseline untreated: 8-9/10)
- Pain relief: Approximately 50-60% improvement
- Goal: Acceptable pain control achieved
 
ACTIVITY/FUNCTION:
- Improved walking tolerance (1 block vs. 1/2 block)
- Maintains independence with ADLs
- Able to participate in grandchildren's activities (goal achieved)
- Sleep improved to 5-6 hours (from 3-4 hours)
- Pursuing physical reconditioning
 
ADVERSE EFFECTS:
- Constipation: Mild, controlled with docusate
- Sedation: None reported
- Other: No nausea, pruritus, or cognitive effects
 
ABERRANT BEHAVIORS:
- None identified
- No early refill requests
- Pill count consistent
- UDT consistent with prescribed regimen
- Attends all appointments
- Compliant with opioid agreement
 
5. PDMP AND MONITORING COMPLIANCE:
- PDMP: Reviewed and consistent
- UDT: Consistent with prescribed regimen, no illicit substances
- Pill count: Within expected range
- Opioid agreement: In place, patient compliant
- Naloxone: Prescribed and in home
 
6. BENEFITS VS. RISKS ANALYSIS:
 
BENEFITS of continued opioid therapy:
- Meaningful pain reduction (50-60%)
- Functional improvement (walking, ADLs, sleep)
- Maintained quality of life
- No escalating doses (stable 18 months)
 
RISKS being monitored:
- Moderate baseline risk (history of AUD, family history)
- Physical dependence (expected with chronic therapy)
- Potential long-term effects
 
CONCLUSION: Benefits continue to outweigh risks. Patient demonstrates responsible medication use with improved function and no aberrant behaviors. Continue current regimen with enhanced monitoring per moderate risk status.
 
7. DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES CONSIDERED:
- Opioid use disorder: No criteria met (no cravings, no loss of control, no consequences, functional improvement)
- Medication diversion: No evidence (consistent UDT, pill counts, PDMP)
- Pseudoaddiction: Not applicable (adequate pain relief reported)
 
8. COMORBID CONDITIONS:
- Major depressive disorder, mild (F32.0) - Stable on therapy
- Alcohol use disorder, in sustained remission (F10.21) - Stable 8 years
- Hypertension (I10) - Controlled
- Obesity (E66.9) - Stable
 

Plan Section (P)

The pain management Plan documents multimodal treatment strategies, controlled substance prescribing details, monitoring protocols, and safety planning.

Plan Section (P) Components

  1. Multimodal Treatment Plan:

    • Pharmacologic interventions (opioid and non-opioid)
    • Interventional procedures
    • Physical/occupational therapy
    • Psychological/behavioral therapies
    • Complementary approaches
  2. Opioid Prescribing Details:

    • Specific medication, dose, quantity, directions
    • Rationale for dose (continuation, increase, decrease, rotation)
    • MME calculation
    • PDMP documentation statement
  3. Non-Opioid Medications:

    • Adjuvant analgesics
    • Medications for side effect management
    • Tapering plans if applicable
  4. Monitoring Plan:

    • UDT frequency
    • Pill count schedule
    • PDMP review frequency
    • Follow-up interval
  5. Opioid Agreement Documentation:

    • Status of treatment agreement
    • Any updates or discussions
  6. Safety Planning:

    • Naloxone prescription
    • Storage instructions
    • Overdose prevention education
  7. Interventional Procedures:

    • Planned procedures with rationale
    • Prior authorization status
  8. Referrals:

    • Specialty referrals
    • Behavioral health
    • Substance use treatment if needed

Example Plan Section for Pain Management

Plan (Pain Management)
 
 
PLAN:
 
1. MULTIMODAL PAIN MANAGEMENT APPROACH:
 
A. PHARMACOLOGIC:
 
Opioid Therapy:
- CONTINUE Oxycodone 10mg PO q6h PRN for breakthrough pain
- Quantity: #90 tablets
- Days supply: 30 days
- Refills: 0 (Schedule II)
- E-prescribed to: [Pharmacy name]
- MEDD: 45 MME/day (below 50 MME/day threshold)
- Rationale: Stable, effective regimen with demonstrated functional improvement and no aberrant behaviors
 
Non-Opioid Analgesics:
- CONTINUE Gabapentin 600mg TID (neuropathic pain component)
- CONTINUE Meloxicam 15mg daily (inflammatory component)
 
Adjuvants:
- CONTINUE Tizanidine 4mg TID PRN for muscle spasms
- CONTINUE Docusate 100mg BID for OIC prevention
 
B. INTERVENTIONAL:
- Discussed spinal cord stimulator trial
- Patient interested in evaluation
- Referral placed to interventional spine for SCS candidacy assessment
- Goal: Reduce opioid requirements if SCS effective
 
C. PHYSICAL THERAPY/REHABILITATION:
- Continue home exercise program (HEP)
- Referral for pool therapy evaluation (reduce axial loading)
- Encouraged continued walking program with gradual increase
 
D. BEHAVIORAL HEALTH:
- Continue monthly therapy for chronic pain coping
- Mindfulness-based stress reduction discussed
- Sleep hygiene counseling provided
 
E. COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES:
- Continue TENS unit use as needed
- Continue ice/heat as helpful
- Discussed acupuncture option (patient considering)
 
2. CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE DOCUMENTATION:
 
PDMP COMPLIANCE:
- PDMP reviewed today: No concerning findings
- Patient receiving controlled substances from this practice only
- Documented in medical record
 
PRESCRIPTION MONITORING:
- Next PDMP check: At next visit (30 days)
- UDT: Performed today - consistent results
- Next UDT: 90 days (per moderate risk protocol)
- Pill count: Performed today - consistent
- Next pill count: Next visit
 
OPIOID AGREEMENT:
- Current agreement on file (signed [date])
- Agreement reviewed and reaffirmed verbally today
- Patient continues to demonstrate compliance
- Next formal renewal: 6 months
 
3. SAFETY PLANNING:
 
Naloxone:
- Confirmed naloxone (Narcan nasal spray) in home
- Last dispensed: [date]
- Family trained on administration
- Refill if used or expired
 
Medication Safety:
- Counseled on safe storage (locked cabinet)
- Counseled on not sharing medications
- Dispose of unused medications properly
 
Overdose Prevention:
- Avoid alcohol while on opioids
- Do not take more than prescribed
- Do not combine with benzodiazepines or sedatives
- Call 911 immediately if overdose suspected
 
4. PATIENT EDUCATION PROVIDED:
- Reviewed importance of multimodal approach
- Discussed risks of long-term opioid therapy
- Reinforced not to share medications
- Discussed SCS as potential opioid-sparing intervention
- Provided handout on home exercise program
 
5. REFERRALS:
- Interventional Pain (SCS evaluation): Referral placed
- Physical Therapy (aquatic therapy): Referral placed
 
6. LABORATORY/DIAGNOSTIC:
- Annual labs ordered: CBC, CMP, LFTs (monitor for medication effects)
- Repeat lumbar MRI if symptoms significantly change
 
7. FOLLOW-UP:
- Return: 30 days for medication management
- Bring: Current pill bottle for count
- Contact clinic for: Significant change in pain, side effects, early refill needs (will not be honored without documented reason)
 
8. EMERGENCY INSTRUCTIONS:
- ED for: Signs of overdose, severe neurological changes (weakness, bowel/bladder dysfunction), severe uncontrolled pain
- Call clinic for: Medication questions, side effects, refill issues
 
BILLING/CODING:
- 99214 (Established patient, moderate complexity)
- G8730 (PDMP checked)
- G9633 (Opioid pain treatment agreement documented)
 

AI-Assisted Documentation for Pain Management

As of 2025, 66% of healthcare providers utilize AI tools in their practice. AI scribes can significantly reduce documentation burden for pain management providers while maintaining the comprehensive records required for regulatory compliance.

How AI Can Help with Pain Management Documentation

  • Pain assessment capture: Documents comprehensive PQRST pain characterization from patient conversation
  • Medication reconciliation: Accurately captures complex medication regimens with dosing
  • Functional assessment: Documents patient-reported functional status and changes
  • Compliance documentation: Assists with standardized monitoring documentation
  • Template generation: Creates structured notes with required elements

Controlled Substance Documentation Considerations

Critical Elements AI Must Capture Accurately:

  • Medication names and dosages: Verify exact opioid doses, quantities, and directions
  • PDMP review documentation: Confirm statement that PDMP was reviewed
  • UDT results: Verify interpretation accurately reflects results
  • Pill count results: Confirm numbers and calculations
  • Risk assessment scores: Verify ORT, SOAPP scores if discussed
  • MME calculations: Double-check morphine equivalent dosing

What AI Captures Well:

  • Patient-reported pain levels and descriptors
  • Functional status descriptions
  • Treatment history discussion
  • Side effect reporting
  • Patient goals and preferences
  • Education and counseling provided

What Requires Careful Clinician Review:

  1. Opioid prescribing details: ALWAYS verify medication, dose, quantity, directions
  2. PDMP findings: Ensure documented review is accurate
  3. Risk stratification: Confirm assessment aligns with clinical judgment
  4. Behavioral observations: Verify observations match your assessment
  5. Compliance language: Ensure agreement status accurately documented
  6. MME calculations: Verify morphine equivalent doses

AI Documentation Review Checklist for Pain Management

AI Documentation Review Checklist - Pain Management
 
 
AI DOCUMENTATION REVIEW - PAIN MANAGEMENT VISITS
 
CRITICAL VERIFICATION (review before signing):
 
CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE PRESCRIBING:
[ ] Medication name exactly correct
[ ] Dose exactly correct
[ ] Quantity exactly correct
[ ] Directions exactly correct
[ ] MME calculation accurate
[ ] Rationale for prescribing documented
 
COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTATION:
[ ] PDMP review documented with date
[ ] PDMP findings accurately stated
[ ] UDT results correctly interpreted
[ ] Pill count accurately documented (if performed)
[ ] Opioid agreement status correct
[ ] Naloxone status documented
 
RISK ASSESSMENT:
[ ] Risk category accurately stated (low/moderate/high)
[ ] Risk tool scores correct (if documented)
[ ] Behavioral observations accurate
[ ] Signs of misuse evaluation documented
 
CLINICAL FINDINGS:
[ ] Pain scores accurate
[ ] Physical exam findings accurate
[ ] Functional assessment reflects discussion
[ ] 4 A's assessment reasonable
 
PLAN:
[ ] Follow-up interval correct
[ ] Monitoring plan appropriate for risk level
[ ] Safety instructions included
[ ] Referrals accurately documented
 

For more details, see our complete AI-Assisted Documentation Guide.

Telehealth Pain Management Documentation

Telehealth for pain management involving controlled substances requires careful attention to both telehealth documentation requirements and DEA regulations.

DEA Telehealth Prescribing Rules for Controlled Substances

Per DEA Telehealth Prescribing Regulations and the 2024 Telemedicine Final Rule:

Current Framework (as of 2025):

  1. Establishing Patient Relationship: The DEA requires at least one in-person evaluation for prescribing controlled substances, unless specific exceptions apply
  2. Telemedicine Exceptions: Special registration may allow prescribing via telemedicine in certain circumstances
  3. State Laws Apply: Many states have additional restrictions on telehealth prescribing of controlled substances
  4. Schedule II Limitations: Most stringent requirements apply to Schedule II opioids

Documentation Requirements for Telehealth Controlled Substance Visits:

  1. In-Person Relationship Documentation: Document date and nature of qualifying in-person evaluation
  2. Telehealth Platform: HIPAA-compliant, audio-video required for controlled substance discussions
  3. Patient Identity Verification: Robust verification required
  4. State Locations: Document both patient and provider state (critical for licensure and prescribing authority)
  5. Examination Limitations: Clearly document what cannot be assessed via telehealth
  6. Appropriateness Statement: Justify why telehealth is appropriate for this controlled substance patient

Telehealth Pain Management Documentation Template

Telehealth Pain Management Documentation
 
 
TELEHEALTH VISIT - PAIN MANAGEMENT (Controlled Substance Follow-Up)
 
TELEHEALTH DETAILS:
- Platform: [HIPAA-compliant platform name] (audio-video)
- Patient Location: [State] (Patient at home)
- Provider Location: [State]
- Identity Verification: Visual verification via video plus DOB confirmation
- Consent: Verbal consent for telehealth pain management visit obtained
- Audio-Video Quality: [Good/Fair] - adequate for clinical assessment
 
IN-PERSON RELATIONSHIP DOCUMENTATION:
- Established patient: Yes
- Last in-person visit: [date]
- Next scheduled in-person visit: [date]
- Qualifying relationship for controlled substance prescribing: Established
 
APPROPRIATENESS FOR TELEHEALTH:
This follow-up visit for stable chronic pain management is appropriate for telehealth because:
- Established patient with documented in-person evaluations
- Chronic stable condition with no acute changes
- Current monitoring (PDMP, UDT) up to date
- No examination findings needed that require in-person evaluation
- Patient unable to travel due to [functional limitations/distance/other]
 
SUBJECTIVE (via telehealth):
[Document pain assessment, functional status, medication use, compliance]
 
OBJECTIVE (Modified for Telehealth):
VITAL SIGNS (patient-reported):
- Blood Pressure: [from home monitor]
- Weight: [from home scale]
- Pain Score: [current]
 
VIDEO ASSESSMENT:
- General appearance: [observed via video]
- Apparent distress level: [observed]
- Mobility: [patient demonstrated rising from chair, gait if possible]
- Mental status: Alert, engaged, no signs of sedation or intoxication
 
OBSERVED FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT:
- Patient demonstrated: [range of motion, standing, walking if visible]
- Self-reported functional status: [document changes]
 
PDMP REVIEW:
- PDMP reviewed: [date]
- Findings: [consistent/concerns]
 
LAST UDT RESULTS ([date]):
- Results: [consistent with prescribed regimen/concerns]
- Note: In-person UDT scheduled for next visit
 
EXAMINATION LIMITATIONS:
Unable to perform via telehealth: Detailed palpation, neurological testing, physical pill count. Patient scheduled for in-person visit [date] for comprehensive examination and UDT.
 
ASSESSMENT:
[Standard pain management assessment]
 
PLAN:
CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE PRESCRIBING (via telehealth):
- [Medication, dose, quantity, directions]
- E-prescribed to [pharmacy]
- Note: Prescription permitted via telehealth based on established in-person relationship and stable condition
 
MONITORING:
- In-person visit scheduled: [date] for comprehensive exam, UDT, pill count
- PDMP: Reviewed today
- Virtual pill count: [if performed, patient showed via video]
 
FOLLOW-UP:
- Telehealth follow-up: [date] if condition stable
- In-person required: At minimum every [90 days/per state requirement]
 

State-Specific Considerations

Important: State laws vary significantly regarding telehealth prescribing of controlled substances. Before prescribing:

  1. Verify prescriber is licensed in patient's state
  2. Confirm state allows telehealth prescribing of controlled substances
  3. Document compliance with state-specific requirements
  4. Some states require more frequent in-person visits
  5. Some states prohibit initial controlled substance prescriptions via telehealth

For complete telehealth documentation guidance, see our Telehealth SOAP Notes Guide.

Free Pain Management SOAP Note Templates

Chronic Pain Follow-Up Template

CHRONIC PAIN MANAGEMENT FOLLOW-UP SOAP NOTE
 
PATIENT: _______________ DOB: ___________ MRN: ___________
DATE: _______________ PROVIDER: _______________
 
VISIT TYPE: [ ] Routine Follow-Up [ ] Urgent [ ] Post-Procedure
 
═══════════════════════════════════════
PRE-VISIT DOCUMENTATION
═══════════════════════════════════════
PDMP Reviewed: [ ] Yes Date: ___________
Findings: [ ] Consistent [ ] Concerns: ___________
 
Last UDT Date: ___________
Results: [ ] Consistent [ ] Inconsistent: ___________
 
Opioid Agreement: [ ] On file (date: ___) [ ] Needs renewal [ ] N/A
 
═══════════════════════════════════════
SUBJECTIVE
═══════════════════════════════════════
PAIN ASSESSMENT:
- Primary location: ___________
- Quality: [ ] Aching [ ] Burning [ ] Sharp [ ] Stabbing [ ] Other: ___
- Current severity (0-10): ___
- Average (since last visit): ___
- Best: ___ Worst: ___
- Radiation: [ ] None [ ] To: ___________
- Aggravating factors: ___________
- Relieving factors: ___________
- Changes since last visit: [ ] Improved [ ] Same [ ] Worse
 
FUNCTIONAL STATUS:
- ADL performance: [ ] Independent [ ] Modified [ ] Dependent
- Sleep: ___ hours/night, quality: ___________
- Work status: [ ] Working [ ] Disability [ ] Retired
- Activity level: ___________
- Mood: ___________
 
CURRENT MEDICATIONS:
- Opioid: ___________ Dose: ___ Taking: ___ per day
- Compliance: [ ] Taking as prescribed [ ] Less than prescribed [ ] More than prescribed
- Side effects: [ ] None [ ] Constipation [ ] Sedation [ ] Other: ___
 
NON-OPIOID MEDICATIONS:
- ___________
 
TREATMENT ADHERENCE:
- Missed appointments: [ ] None [ ] ___
- Early refill requests: [ ] None [ ] ___
- Lost/stolen medications: [ ] None [ ] ___
 
RISK ASSESSMENT UPDATE:
- New substance use: [ ] None [ ] ___________
- Mental health changes: [ ] None [ ] ___________
- Suicidal ideation: [ ] Denies [ ] Present (assess further)
 
═══════════════════════════════════════
OBJECTIVE
═══════════════════════════════════════
VITAL SIGNS:
- BP: ___/___ HR: ___ Weight: ___ Pain: ___/10
 
GENERAL APPEARANCE:
- [ ] No acute distress [ ] Distress level: ___
- [ ] No signs of sedation/intoxication [ ] Concerns: ___
- [ ] Appropriate affect [ ] Concerns: ___
 
PAIN-FOCUSED EXAMINATION:
- Inspection: ___________
- Palpation: ___________
- Range of motion: ___________
- Neurological: ___________
- Special tests: ___________
 
BEHAVIORAL OBSERVATIONS:
- [ ] No aberrant behaviors observed
- [ ] Concerns noted: ___________
 
URINE DRUG TEST (if performed today):
- Specimen valid: [ ] Yes [ ] No
- Expected medications: [ ] Present [ ] Absent: ___
- Unexpected substances: [ ] None [ ] Present: ___
- Interpretation: [ ] Consistent [ ] Inconsistent: ___
 
PILL COUNT (if performed):
- Medication: ___________
- Remaining: ___ tablets
- Expected: ___ tablets
- [ ] Consistent [ ] Inconsistent
 
═══════════════════════════════════════
ASSESSMENT
═══════════════════════════════════════
1. Chronic pain diagnosis: ___________ (ICD-10: ___)
Status: [ ] Stable [ ] Improved [ ] Worsening
 
2. Opioid therapy status:
Current MEDD: ___ MME/day
Response: [ ] Effective [ ] Partially effective [ ] Ineffective
 
3. Risk stratification: [ ] Low [ ] Moderate [ ] High
Basis: ___________
 
4. 4 A's Evaluation:
- Analgesia: ___________
- Activity: ___________
- Adverse effects: ___________
- Aberrant behaviors: ___________
 
5. Benefit/Risk assessment:
[ ] Benefits continue to outweigh risks
[ ] Concerns identified: ___________
 
═══════════════════════════════════════
PLAN
═══════════════════════════════════════
1. OPIOID THERAPY:
[ ] Continue current regimen: ___________
[ ] Adjust: ___________
[ ] Taper: ___________
Quantity: ___ Days supply: ___
MEDD: ___ MME
 
2. NON-OPIOID MEDICATIONS:
[ ] Continue: ___________
[ ] Add/Change: ___________
 
3. MULTIMODAL TREATMENTS:
[ ] Physical therapy: ___________
[ ] Interventional procedures: ___________
[ ] Behavioral health: ___________
[ ] Other: ___________
 
4. MONITORING PLAN:
- Next PDMP review: ___________
- Next UDT: ___________
- Next pill count: ___________
 
5. SAFETY:
- Naloxone: [ ] In home [ ] Prescribed today [ ] Declined
- Storage counseled: [ ] Yes
- Overdose prevention counseled: [ ] Yes
 
6. FOLLOW-UP: ___ weeks/months
 
7. RETURN PRECAUTIONS: ___________
 
Provider Signature: _______________ Date: ___________
 

Opioid Treatment Agreement Documentation Template

OPIOID TREATMENT AGREEMENT DOCUMENTATION
 
DATE: ___________
PATIENT: ___________
PROVIDER: ___________
 
═══════════════════════════════════════
AGREEMENT STATUS
═══════════════════════════════════════
[ ] New opioid treatment agreement signed today
[ ] Existing agreement on file (original date: ___)
[ ] Agreement renewed today (previous date: ___)
 
═══════════════════════════════════════
AGREEMENT ELEMENTS REVIEWED
═══════════════════════════════════════
The following elements of the opioid treatment agreement were reviewed with the patient:
 
PATIENT RESPONSIBILITIES:
[ ] Obtain opioid medications from one prescriber and one pharmacy only
[ ] Take medications exactly as prescribed - do not increase dose without approval
[ ] No early refills - lost, stolen, or destroyed medications will not be replaced
[ ] Submit to urine drug testing when requested
[ ] Submit to pill counts when requested
[ ] Keep all scheduled appointments
[ ] Store medications securely, away from others
[ ] Do not share medications with anyone
[ ] Inform provider of all other medications being taken
[ ] Do not use illicit drugs or non-prescribed controlled substances
[ ] Do not obtain controlled substances from any other source
[ ] Inform all other healthcare providers of opioid therapy
[ ] Carry naloxone as prescribed
 
PROVIDER RESPONSIBILITIES:
[ ] Prescribe opioids according to established medical standards
[ ] Monitor for effectiveness and side effects
[ ] Provide or refer for non-opioid pain treatments
[ ] Review PDMP before each prescription
[ ] Order drug testing as clinically indicated
[ ] Respond to patient concerns and questions
[ ] Maintain confidentiality as legally permitted
 
GROUNDS FOR DISCONTINUATION:
[ ] Reviewed circumstances under which opioid therapy may be discontinued:
- Violation of agreement terms
- Evidence of diversion
- Failure to achieve functional improvement
- Development of substance use disorder
- Repeated non-compliance with monitoring
- Safety concerns
 
═══════════════════════════════════════
INFORMED CONSENT DISCUSSION
═══════════════════════════════════════
The following risks and benefits of opioid therapy were discussed:
 
RISKS:
[ ] Addiction potential (opioid use disorder)
[ ] Physical dependence and withdrawal
[ ] Tolerance requiring dose increases
[ ] Overdose (potentially fatal)
[ ] Respiratory depression
[ ] Constipation, nausea, sedation
[ ] Hormonal effects (hypogonadism)
[ ] Immune effects
[ ] Hyperalgesia (worsening pain)
[ ] Cognitive effects
[ ] Interaction with other medications/substances
 
BENEFITS:
[ ] Pain reduction
[ ] Improved function
[ ] Improved quality of life
 
ALTERNATIVES DISCUSSED:
[ ] Non-opioid medications
[ ] Interventional procedures
[ ] Physical therapy
[ ] Behavioral/psychological therapies
[ ] Complementary approaches
 
═══════════════════════════════════════
PATIENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT
═══════════════════════════════════════
Patient verbalized understanding of:
[ ] Agreement terms
[ ] Risks and benefits
[ ] Alternatives
[ ] Consequences of non-compliance
 
Patient had opportunity to ask questions: [ ] Yes
Patient questions addressed: [ ] Yes [ ] N/A
 
Patient agreement: [ ] Written consent obtained [ ] Verbal consent documented
 
═══════════════════════════════════════
PROVIDER ATTESTATION
═══════════════════════════════════════
I have reviewed the opioid treatment agreement with the patient, answered questions, and determined that opioid therapy is medically appropriate for this patient at this time.
 
Provider Signature: _______________ Date: ___________
Patient Signature: _______________ Date: ___________
Witness (if applicable): _______________ Date: ___________
 

Official Resources and References

Federal Agencies

Professional Organizations

Frequently Asked Questions

DEA compliance requires documentation of: (1) legitimate medical purpose for prescribing, (2) established patient-provider relationship, (3) valid DEA registration, (4) proper prescription format with patient identifiers, date, drug name, strength, quantity, directions, and prescriber signature, (5) Schedule II prescriptions cannot include refills, and (6) for electronic prescribing of controlled substances (EPCS), the system must meet DEA certification requirements. Document all elements in your SOAP note to demonstrate compliance with 21 CFR Part 1306.

Per CDC guidelines and most state laws, PDMP should be checked before initiating opioid therapy and periodically during treatment. Most states require PDMP checks every 1-3 months for stable patients, with many mandating checks before every Schedule II prescription. Document each PDMP review with the date, findings (consistent vs. concerns), and any action taken. This documentation is critical for demonstrating due diligence in controlled substance prescribing.

The 4 A's is a validated framework for assessing opioid therapy effectiveness: Analgesia (pain relief achieved), Activity (functional improvement), Adverse effects (side effects and management), and Aberrant behaviors (signs of misuse or diversion). Document each element at every visit, using objective measures when possible. For example: 'Analgesia: 50% pain relief. Activity: Walking tolerance improved from 1/2 block to 1 block. Adverse effects: Mild constipation, managed with docusate. Aberrant behaviors: None observed, UDT consistent, pill count accurate.'

Document UDT comprehensively including: specimen validity (temperature, creatinine, pH), expected medications (should be positive for prescribed opioids), unexpected positives or negatives, and your clinical interpretation. When results are inconsistent, document your discussion with the patient, their explanation, whether confirmatory testing was ordered, and the action plan. Use objective, non-judgmental language. Example: 'UDT: Oxycodone positive (expected), THC positive (unexpected). Patient reports CBD oil use. Confirmatory GC/MS ordered. Counseled on THC avoidance per opioid agreement.'

Document the specific MME calculation using CDC conversion factors, compare to risk thresholds (50 MME/day and 90 MME/day), and provide clinical justification for doses exceeding thresholds. Example documentation: 'Current regimen: Oxycodone 10mg QID = 40mg/day = 60 MME/day. Below 90 MME threshold. Dose justified by documented functional improvement, failure of lower doses, and stable monitoring parameters.' Also document naloxone co-prescription for patients at higher risk.

Document that the opioid treatment agreement was reviewed, signed, and understood by the patient. Include: date of original agreement, date of any renewals, key elements discussed (single prescriber/pharmacy, no early refills, UDT requirements, medication storage, grounds for discontinuation), patient acknowledgment of risks and benefits, and alternatives discussed. Note patient compliance status at each visit. Example: 'Opioid treatment agreement on file (signed 6/2025, reviewed today). Patient compliant with all terms. Risks of long-term opioid therapy reviewed including addiction, overdose, and tolerance.'

Yes, SOAPNoteAI.com offers AI-assisted documentation specifically designed for healthcare providers, including pain management specialists. The platform is fully HIPAA-compliant with a signed Business Associate Agreement (BAA), ensuring patient data protection. It works on iPhone, iPad, and web browsers, allowing you to dictate or input patient encounters and receive properly formatted SOAP notes with pain management-specific elements like PDMP documentation, UDT interpretation, MME calculations, and 4 A's assessments. The AI understands controlled substance documentation requirements and helps ensure regulatory compliance while significantly reducing documentation time.

Medical Disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and should not replace professional medical judgment. Always consult current clinical guidelines and your institution's policies.

Was this page helpful?