Ophthalmology: Step-by-Step Guide on How to Write SOAP Notes

Updated January 2026

Ophthalmology SOAP notes require precise documentation of specialized examinations and measurements unique to eye care. From visual acuity testing to detailed fundus examinations, comprehensive documentation is essential for tracking disease progression, justifying treatment decisions, and providing medicolegal protection. This guide provides detailed instructions for documenting ophthalmology encounters across all subspecialties.

Create Your Ophthalmology SOAP Note in 2 Minutes

Start with 20 free SOAP notes. No credit card required.

Unique Aspects of Ophthalmology Documentation

Ophthalmology documentation differs from general medical notes in several key ways:

  1. Bilateral Documentation: Almost all findings must be documented for both eyes separately (OD/OS/OU)
  2. Quantitative Measurements: Visual acuity, IOP, refractive error require precise numerical documentation
  3. Specialized Equipment: Document examination technique (slit lamp, fundoscopy, OCT, visual fields)
  4. Anatomical Precision: Use standardized terminology (clock hours, zones, specific anatomical structures)
  5. Progressive Conditions: Many eye diseases require comparison to baseline and prior visits
  6. Surgical Planning: Documentation often directly supports surgical necessity and planning

Subjective Section (S)

In an ophthalmology SOAP note, the Subjective section captures the patient's chief complaint and ocular history, often requiring laterality specification and functional impact assessment.

Subjective Section (S) Components

  1. Chief Complaint:

    • The primary reason for the visit with laterality
    • Example: "Blurred vision in right eye for 3 days" or "Routine diabetic eye exam"
  2. History of Present Illness:

    • Onset, duration, progression of symptoms
    • Laterality (one or both eyes)
    • Associated symptoms (pain, photophobia, discharge, floaters)
    • Impact on daily activities (reading, driving, work)
    • Example: "68-year-old female with gradual onset of decreased vision OS over 6 months. Describes vision as 'cloudy.' More difficulty with night driving. Denies eye pain, redness, or flashes/floaters. No trauma."
  3. Ocular History:

    • Previous eye conditions or diagnoses
    • Prior eye surgeries with dates
    • Current eye medications
    • Contact lens or glasses wear
    • Example: "PMOcH: Myopia since childhood. Bilateral cataract surgery 2015 with posterior chamber IOLs. Dry eye syndrome. No history of glaucoma, retinal detachment, or macular degeneration."
  4. Systemic Medical History (Relevant to Eyes):

    • Diabetes and duration
    • Hypertension
    • Autoimmune conditions
    • Medications that affect eyes (steroids, hydroxychloroquine, tamoxifen)
    • Example: "PMH: Type 2 diabetes for 15 years (HbA1c 7.2%), hypertension, hyperlipidemia. Current medications: metformin, lisinopril, atorvastatin. No known drug allergies."
  5. Family Ocular History:

    • Glaucoma, macular degeneration, retinal detachment
    • Age of onset if known
    • Example: "FH: Mother had glaucoma diagnosed at age 65. Father had macular degeneration."
  6. Social History (As Relevant):

    • Occupation (especially for occupational eye hazards)
    • Smoking history (AMD risk factor)
    • Sun exposure
    • Example: "Retired accountant. Former smoker (quit 10 years ago, 20 pack-year history). Wears sunglasses regularly."
  7. Review of Systems (Ocular and Related):

    • Pain, redness, discharge
    • Flashes, floaters, visual field defects
    • Diplopia, photophobia
    • Headaches
    • Example: "Denies eye pain, redness, discharge, flashes, floaters, or diplopia. No headaches."
Example Subjective Section
 
CC: Decreased vision both eyes, worse at night
 
HPI: 72-year-old male presents for evaluation of gradually progressive blurred vision OU over past 2 years. Reports significant difficulty with night driving due to glare from oncoming headlights. Vision seems 'cloudy' and colors appear less vibrant. Denies eye pain, redness, flashes, floaters, or diplopia. Vision worse in bright light.
 
PMOcH: Myopia since childhood (-6.00 D OU). Laser peripheral iridotomy OU in 2018 for narrow angles. No history of uveitis, trauma, or prior surgeries. Wears progressive bifocals.
 
Medications: Latanoprost 0.005% OU qhs (for glaucoma suspect), artificial tears prn
Allergies: NKDA
 
PMH: Type 2 diabetes (15 years, HbA1c 6.8%), controlled hypertension, hyperlipidemia
Current medications: Metformin 1000 mg BID, lisinopril 20 mg daily, atorvastatin 40 mg qhs
 
FH: Father had glaucoma. Mother had macular degeneration.
 
SH: Retired engineer. Non-smoker. Denies alcohol or drug use.
 
ROS: Denies headaches, temporal pain, jaw claudication, or vision loss episodes.

Objective Section (O)

The Objective section documents measurable findings from the ophthalmology examination using specialized equipment and techniques.

Objective Section (O) Components

  1. Visual Acuity (Distance and Near):

    • Document for each eye separately with correction status
    • Pinhole testing if vision reduced
    • Near vision when relevant
    • Example: "VA: OD 20/40 sc, 20/25 cc, PH 20/20; OS 20/50 sc, 20/30 cc, PH 20/25; OU 20/30 cc. Near: J2 OU with readers."
  2. Pupils:

    • Size, shape, reactivity
    • Presence of relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD)
    • Example: "Pupils: 4 mm in dim light, round, reactive to light and accommodation. No RAPD."
  3. Extraocular Movements (EOM):

    • Full in all fields of gaze or specific limitations
    • Example: "EOM: Full OU, no nystagmus or strabismus. Cover test: orthophoric at distance and near."
  4. Confrontation Visual Fields:

    • Screening test for gross defects
    • Example: "CVF: Full to finger counting OU" or "CVF: Inferior field defect OS"
  5. Intraocular Pressure (IOP):

    • Measurement for each eye with method and time
    • Example: "IOP: OD 16 mmHg, OS 18 mmHg by Goldmann applanation at 2:00 PM"
  6. Slit Lamp Examination:

    • Systematic anterior segment evaluation
    • Lids and lashes
    • Conjunctiva and sclera
    • Cornea
    • Anterior chamber depth and cells
    • Iris
    • Lens
    • Example detailed below
  7. Dilated Fundus Examination:

    • Optic nerve (cup-to-disc ratio, color, margins)
    • Macula (foveal reflex, lesions)
    • Vessels (caliber, AV ratio, crossing changes)
    • Periphery (tears, holes, degeneration)
    • Vitreous
    • Example detailed below
  8. Gonioscopy (when indicated):

    • Angle anatomy and grading
    • Pigmentation, peripheral anterior synechiae
    • Example: "Gonioscopy: Shaffer grade 3-4 OU, no PAS, moderate trabecular pigmentation"
  9. Ancillary Testing (when performed):

    • OCT (retinal thickness, layer analysis)
    • Visual field testing (mean deviation, pattern)
    • Corneal topography
    • Fundus photos
    • Example: "OCT macula: Central subfield thickness 245 microns OD, 238 microns OS. No intraretinal or subretinal fluid. Intact ellipsoid zone."
Example Objective Section
 
VA: OD 20/40 sc → 20/30-2 cc (no improvement with refraction)
OS 20/60 sc → 20/40 cc (no improvement with refraction)
OU 20/30 cc
Near: J3 OU with +2.50 add
 
Pupils: 4 mm in dim light, round, reactive to light and accommodation. No RAPD OU.
 
EOM: Full OU, no restriction. Orthophoric at distance and near.
 
CVF: Full to finger counting OU
 
IOP: OD 15 mmHg, OS 16 mmHg (Goldmann applanation, 2:00 PM)
 
Slit Lamp Examination:
- Lids/Lashes: Normal OU
- Conjunctiva: White and quiet OU
- Cornea: Clear OU, no epithelial defects, no edema
- Anterior Chamber: Deep and quiet OU, no cells or flare
- Iris: Normal architecture OU, patent LPIs at 11 and 1 o'clock OU
- Lens: 3+ nuclear sclerosis OU, 2+ cortical spoking OU, 1+ posterior subcapsular opacity OS
 
Dilated Fundus Examination (1% tropicamide, 2.5% phenylephrine):
- Optic Nerve: CD ratio 0.4 OU, pink and healthy, distinct margins
- Macula: Flat OU, normal foveal reflex, no edema or exudates
- Vessels: Normal caliber, AV ratio 2:3, no tortuosity or crossing changes
- Periphery: Lattice degeneration superotemporal OD, no tears or holes
- Vitreous: Clear OU, no posterior vitreous detachment
 
OCT Macula: Central subfield thickness 248 microns OD, 242 microns OS. Normal foveal contour. Intact ellipsoid zone OU.

Tips for Documenting Objective Findings in Ophthalmology

  • Use Standardized Abbreviations: OD (right eye), OS (left eye), OU (both eyes), cc (with correction), sc (without correction), PH (pinhole)
  • Be Specific with Location: Use clock hours for lesion location (e.g., "retinal tear at 10 o'clock periphery")
  • Include Comparison Data: Reference prior measurements, especially for IOP and visual acuity
  • Document Testing Conditions: Dilation drops used, lighting conditions, cooperation level
  • Use Grading Systems: Nuclear sclerosis (1-4+), angle grading (Shaffer or Scheie), diabetic retinopathy staging
  • Note Asymmetry: Document any differences between eyes prominently
  • Include Negative Findings: "No neovascularization" is as important as positive findings

Assessment Section (A)

The Assessment section synthesizes subjective complaints and objective findings into diagnoses with laterality and severity.

Assessment Section (A) Components

  1. Primary Diagnosis:

    • Specific diagnosis with laterality and staging/severity
    • ICD-10 code when relevant for billing
    • Example: "Senile nuclear cataract, bilateral (H25.13), moderate severity"
  2. Secondary Diagnoses:

    • Other active ophthalmic conditions
    • Systemic conditions affecting eyes
    • Example: "Nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy without macular edema, bilateral (E11.329); Glaucoma suspect (H40.003)"
  3. Clinical Reasoning:

    • Why this diagnosis explains the findings
    • Rule-outs considered
    • Progression since last visit
    • Example: "Visual symptoms consistent with cataract severity on exam. No evidence of other causes of vision loss. IOP controlled on current regimen."
  4. Functional Impact:

    • How condition affects patient's daily life
    • Disability or impairment
    • Example: "Cataracts interfering with safe night driving and reading. Patient desires surgical intervention."
  5. Risk Factors and Prognosis:

    • Factors affecting progression or treatment success
    • Expected outcome with treatment
    • Example: "Good surgical candidate. Diabetes well-controlled, reducing risk of post-op complications. Expected improvement to 20/25 or better following cataract extraction."
Example Assessment Section
 
1. Bilateral senile cataracts (H25.13), moderate to dense nuclear and cortical components
- Causing significant visual disability, particularly for night driving
- Visual acuity 20/40 OD, 20/60 OS with best correction
- No improvement with refraction, consistent with lenticular opacity
- Left eye more advanced than right
 
2. Nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy, bilateral (E11.329), mild severity
- Scattered microaneurysms and dot-blot hemorrhages OU
- No macular edema on clinical exam or OCT
- Stable compared to exam 6 months ago
- Good diabetic control (HbA1c 6.8%)
 
3. Glaucoma suspect (H40.003)
- IOP controlled at 15-16 mmHg on latanoprost
- CD ratios 0.4 OU, stable
- Patent peripheral iridotomies OU
- Continue current management
 
Patient is appropriate candidate for sequential cataract surgery. Will proceed with left eye first given worse visual acuity. Expected post-operative vision 20/25 or better OU.

Plan Section (P)

The Plan section outlines the treatment approach, surgical planning, patient education, and follow-up schedule.

Plan Section (P) Components

  1. Treatment Plan:

    • Medications with dosing, frequency, duration
    • Surgical recommendations
    • Conservative management options
    • Example: "Plan for phacoemulsification with posterior chamber IOL implantation OS. Schedule pre-operative testing including biometry for IOL power calculation."
  2. Diagnostic Testing:

    • Additional tests ordered
    • Rationale for testing
    • Example: "Order optical biometry for IOL power calculation. Target slight myopia (-0.75 D) for reading preference."
  3. Surgical Planning (when applicable):

    • Specific procedure
    • Laterality and timing
    • Target refraction
    • Lens selection
    • Example: "Phacoemulsification with monofocal IOL OS, schedule for 2 weeks. Discuss options: monofocal for distance vs. toric (minimal astigmatism) vs. premium IOL. Patient prefers standard monofocal."
  4. Patient Education:

    • Instructions provided
    • Risks and benefits discussed
    • Informed consent
    • Example: "Discussed cataract surgery including risks (infection, bleeding, retinal detachment, PCO), benefits (improved vision, reduced glare), and alternatives (updated glasses, watchful waiting). Patient understands and wishes to proceed."
  5. Medications:

    • Continue current medications
    • New prescriptions
    • Pre-operative or post-operative medications
    • Example: "Continue latanoprost 0.005% OU qhs. Will provide post-operative drops (prednisolone, antibiotic) after surgery."
  6. Lifestyle and Activity Modifications:

    • Activity restrictions
    • UV protection
    • Diabetic control
    • Example: "Encouraged continued excellent diabetic control. Recommended UV-blocking sunglasses for AMD prevention."
  7. Follow-Up Plan:

    • When to return
    • What will be monitored
    • Red flags to report
    • Example: "Post-operative day 1 visit scheduled. Follow-up in 1 week and 1 month. Call immediately for severe pain, vision loss, or increased redness."
  8. Coordination of Care:

    • Referrals to other specialists
    • Communication with PCP about diabetic control
    • Example: "Will send cataract surgery report to Dr. Jones (PCP). Recommend continued annual dilated exams with optometrist for diabetic retinopathy screening."
Example Plan Section
 
1. Bilateral cataracts - Surgical management:
- Schedule phacoemulsification with posterior chamber IOL implantation OS (left eye first)
- Order IOLMaster biometry for IOL power calculation
- Target refraction: plano to slight myopia for distance vision
- Discussed monofocal vs. premium IOL options; patient prefers monofocal IOL
- Pre-operative clearance from PCP if not obtained in past year
 
2. Nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy - Medical management:
- Continue current diabetic management with PCP
- Monitor closely for progression to macular edema or proliferative changes
- Repeat dilated exam 3-4 months post-cataract surgery
- Patient counseled on importance of glycemic control
 
3. Glaucoma suspect - Continue current therapy:
- Continue latanoprost 0.005% OU qhs
- IOP well-controlled, optic nerves stable
- Recheck IOP at post-operative visits
 
Patient Education:
- Discussed cataract surgery risks: infection (<1%), retinal detachment (<1%), PCO (20-30%), residual refractive error
- Discussed benefits: improved vision, reduced glare, better quality of life
- Alternatives: updated glasses (unlikely to help significantly), watchful waiting
- Informed consent obtained for left eye surgery
 
Post-Operative Care Plan:
- Post-op day 1 visit scheduled
- Post-op medications: prednisolone acetate 1% QID tapering, moxifloxacin 0.5% QID x 1 week
- Follow-up: 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, then schedule right eye surgery
- Red flags reviewed: severe pain, sudden vision loss, significant redness, discharge
 
Follow-Up:
- Surgery scheduled for 2 weeks
- Will reevaluate right eye cataract 6-8 weeks after left eye surgery
- Continue annual diabetic retinopathy screening
- Recheck IOP at all post-op visits
 
Communication:
- Surgery scheduling letter sent to patient
- Will send operative report to Dr. Jones (PCP)

Tips for Creating Effective Plans in Ophthalmology

  • Specify Laterality: Always indicate which eye(s) for treatments and procedures
  • Target Refraction: Document IOL power calculation goals for cataract surgery
  • Include Measurements: OCT measurements, pachymetry values, K readings for planning
  • Document Alternatives: Show informed decision-making by listing other options considered
  • Timeline: Specify when interventions will occur (immediate, 2 weeks, 6 months)
  • Risk Stratification: Note factors that increase surgical or treatment risks
  • Compliance Considerations: Note patient factors affecting treatment adherence

AI-Assisted Documentation for Ophthalmology

Working with AI Scribes in Ophthalmology

AI-powered documentation tools can significantly reduce charting time while capturing specialized ophthalmology terminology. When using ambient AI documentation:

Speak Clearly During Exam:

  • Verbalize all measurements: "Visual acuity right eye 20-40, left eye 20-60"
  • State laterality explicitly: "Right eye IOP 16, left eye 18"
  • Use full terms first, abbreviations after: "Cup-to-disc ratio 0.4 in both eyes"

Ophthalmology-Specific AI Considerations:

  • Verify all numerical values (VA, IOP, pachymetry, OCT measurements)
  • Confirm laterality (OD/OS) hasn't been reversed
  • Review anatomical location descriptions (clock hours, zones)
  • Check that grading systems are correctly captured (nuclear sclerosis 1-4+)
  • Ensure systematic slit lamp findings are complete

Review Checklist for AI-Generated Ophthalmology Notes:

  • ☐ Visual acuity documented with correction status for each eye
  • ☐ IOP values recorded with method and time
  • ☐ Slit lamp exam complete from lids to lens bilaterally
  • ☐ Fundus exam includes all standard components
  • ☐ Laterality correct throughout (OD/OS/OU)
  • ☐ All numerical measurements verified
  • ☐ Comparison to prior visit documented
  • ☐ Surgical plans include target refraction and lens type
  • ☐ Medication dosing and frequency accurate

Specialty-Specific Vocabulary AI May Misinterpret

Ensure AI correctly captures these ophthalmology terms:

  • "Cup-to-disc" not "cup-to-disk"
  • "Limbus" not "limus"
  • "Shaffer grade" not "Schafer grade"
  • "Neovascularization" not "new vascularization" (one word)
  • "Ellipsoid zone" not "ellipsoidal zone"
  • Clock hours (10 o'clock, not 10 o'clock)

Telehealth Considerations for Ophthalmology

Telehealth has significant limitations for ophthalmology given the specialized examination equipment required. However, certain encounters can be conducted remotely.

Telehealth-Appropriate Visits

  • Post-operative check-ins for symptom assessment
  • Medication management for glaucoma or dry eye
  • Initial consultations before in-person examination
  • Urgent triage (red eye, pain, vision changes)
  • Follow-up for stable chronic conditions with recent exam data

Documentation Requirements for Telehealth

  1. Technology Platform: Document video platform used
  2. Visual Acuity: Patient-measured using app or Amsler grid
  3. Exam Limitations: "Unable to perform slit lamp, IOP, or dilated exam via telehealth"
  4. Image Review: Note any photos/images patient provided
  5. Disposition: Document if in-person exam needed
Example Telehealth Ophthalmology Note
 
CC: Post-operative check 1 week after cataract surgery OS
 
Telehealth visit conducted via [Platform], video and audio quality good.
 
HPI: 72-year-old male post-operative day 7 following uncomplicated phacoemulsification with IOL OS. Reports vision 'much clearer' in left eye. No pain, no redness, no discharge. Using prednisolone and antibiotic drops as directed. No trauma to eye.
 
Self-measured VA using smartphone app: OS approximately 20/30, improved from 20/60 pre-operatively
 
Visual inspection via video:
- Left eye appears white and quiet
- No obvious conjunctival injection
- No visible discharge
- Patient able to open eye fully without pain
 
Assessment: Post-operative day 7 cataract surgery OS, routine healing
 
Plan:
- Continue prednisolone acetate 1% QID tapering per protocol
- Continue moxifloxacin 0.5% TID x 3 more days
- Schedule in-person exam for 3-week post-op visit for IOP check, refraction, and slit lamp exam
- Instruct patient to call immediately for pain, vision loss, or redness
- No restrictions on normal activities

Common Ophthalmology Conditions and Documentation Examples

Cataract

Key Documentation Elements:

  • Lens opacity type and grade (nuclear, cortical, PSC)
  • Visual acuity with best correction
  • Functional impact (glare, night driving)
  • Other causes of vision loss ruled out
  • Surgical planning details

Glaucoma

Key Documentation Elements:

  • IOP with time of measurement
  • Cup-to-disc ratio with comparison to baseline
  • Visual field results (MD, PSD, pattern)
  • OCT RNFL thickness
  • Angle assessment (gonioscopy)
  • Medication regimen and adherence

Diabetic Retinopathy

Key Documentation Elements:

  • DR staging (no DR, mild/moderate/severe NPDR, PDR)
  • Specific findings (MAs, hemorrhages, exudates, NVD/NVE)
  • Macular edema presence and location
  • OCT central subfield thickness
  • Previous laser or anti-VEGF treatment
  • Diabetic control (HbA1c)

Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Key Documentation Elements:

  • Type (dry vs wet)
  • Drusen size and distribution
  • Geographic atrophy if present
  • Choroidal neovascularization on OCT/FA
  • Visual acuity and impact
  • Amsler grid distortion

Medical-Legal Protection

Thorough ophthalmology documentation protects against liability:

  • Pre-Operative Consent: Document risks, benefits, alternatives discussed
  • Surgical Complications: Immediate documentation of intra-operative issues
  • Informed Refusal: When patient declines recommended surgery or treatment
  • Comparison Data: Previous exam findings to show progression
  • Standard of Care: Documentation shows adherence to clinical guidelines

Billing and Coding Support

Ophthalmology documentation must support level of service billed:

  • E/M Level: Complexity of examination and decision-making
  • Surgical Necessity: Functional vision criteria for cataract surgery (typically <20/40 or significant glare disability)
  • Testing Medical Necessity: Rationale for OCT, visual fields, angiography
  • Modifier Usage: Document when procedures done bilaterally (-50) or staged
  • Time-Based Coding: When using time for E/M, document total face-to-face time

Required Elements for Medicolegal Protection

  1. Informed consent documentation for procedures
  2. Visual acuity with best correction
  3. Comparison to prior visit when available
  4. Complications or adverse events immediately documented
  5. Patient education and instructions provided
  6. Follow-up plans and red flag symptoms reviewed

Frequently Asked Questions

Document visual acuity for each eye separately using standardized notation (e.g., 20/20, 20/40). Always specify whether measured with or without correction (sc = without correction, cc = with correction) and the testing distance. Include near vision testing when relevant. Example: 'VA OD 20/20 cc, OS 20/40 sc, improving to 20/25 with pinhole.' Document any limitations like inability to cooperate with testing.

Record IOP for each eye separately with the measurement method specified (e.g., Goldmann applanation tonometry, Tono-Pen, iCare). Include the time of measurement, as IOP fluctuates throughout the day. Example: 'IOP OD 16 mmHg, OS 18 mmHg by Goldmann applanation at 10:00 AM.' For glaucoma patients, note relation to target pressure.

Use systematic documentation from anterior to posterior: lids and lashes, conjunctiva, cornea, anterior chamber, iris, lens. Use standardized grading systems where applicable (e.g., nuclear sclerosis 1-4+). Example: 'Lids/lashes: normal. Conjunctiva: clear. Cornea: clear, no staining. AC: deep and quiet. Iris: normal architecture. Lens: 2+ nuclear sclerosis OU.' Be specific about abnormal findings with location and size.

Document the level of retinopathy using standardized classification (no DR, mild/moderate/severe NPDR, PDR), specific findings (microaneurysms, hemorrhages, exudates, cotton-wool spots, neovascularization), presence and severity of macular edema, and whether findings are clinically significant. Example: 'Moderate NPDR OU with scattered dot-blot hemorrhages, hard exudates temporal to macula OS. No DME. No neovascularization.' Include comparison to previous exams.

Document cup-to-disc ratio (vertical and horizontal if asymmetric), neuroretinal rim appearance, presence of notching or thinning, disc hemorrhages, and peripapillary atrophy. Compare to prior exams and baseline. Example: 'Optic nerve: CD ratio 0.6 OD, 0.7 OS (increased from 0.65 six months ago). Inferior rim thinning OS. No disc hemorrhages. RNFL thinning inferiorly OS on OCT.'

Yes, diagrams are valuable for complex findings like retinal lesions, foreign bodies, or surgical plans. Indicate the location using clock hours and distance from anatomical landmarks (e.g., 'Full-thickness macular hole at fovea, approximately 400 microns'). OCT images and fundus photos are excellent supplements but written descriptions remain essential for the medical record.

Yes, AI-powered documentation tools like SOAPNoteAI.com can significantly reduce documentation time while maintaining comprehensive ophthalmology-specific detail. SOAPNoteAI is HIPAA-compliant with a signed Business Associate Agreement (BAA), offers iPhone and iPad apps for bedside documentation, and captures specialized ophthalmology terminology including visual acuity, IOP, slit lamp findings, and fundus examination details.

Medical Disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and should not replace professional medical judgment. Always consult current clinical guidelines and your institution's policies.

Was this page helpful?